150%
ROI for Asset Tracking Within the Construction Industry
92%
Annual Cost Reduction Using Sim Tracking
Keep reading to discover how we arrived at these numbers.
Low-Power Tracking and Positioning
Combain’s advanced indoor and outdoor positioning technologies are exceptionally well suited for long-term battery life tracking and revolutionizing asset management, workforce management, and operational efficiency.
GNSS and GPS is not enough
Businesses and logistics companies require accurate, real-time tracking of high-value assets, vehicles, and shipments. Traditional GPS trackers have limitations such as high power consumption, limited indoor tracking, and susceptibility to jamming.
Key challenges include:
- Battery life constraints for tracking devices on long-haul shipments.
- Limited GPS reliability in warehouses, urban canyons, and indoor facilities.
- High costs associated with GPS-based tracking solutions.
- Security risks related to cargo theft and asset loss.
Comparison of Cell ID, WiFi, and GPS Positioning
(click for references above)
- Cell ID Positioning:
- Zandbergen, P. A. (2009). “Accuracy of iPhone Locations: A Comparison of Assisted GPS, WiFi and Cellular Positioning.” Transactions in GIS, 13(1), 5-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01152.x
- Djuknic, G. M., & Richton, R. E. (2001). “Geolocation and Assisted GPS.” Computer, 34(2), 123-125. DOI: 10.1109/2.901174
- WiFi Positioning:
- Hsu, C. C., & Lin, C. J. (2015). “Wi-Fi Fingerprinting-Based Indoor Positioning: Design and Implementation.” Wireless Personal Communications, 85(1), 39-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11277-015-2726-2
- Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2000). “RADAR: An In-Building RF-Based User Location and Tracking System.” Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2000, 2, 775-784. DOI: 10.1109/INFCOM.2000.832252
- GPS Positioning:
- Van Diggelen, F. (2009). A-GPS: Assisted GPS, GNSS, and SBAS. Artech House.
- Kaplan, E. D., & Hegarty, C. (2017). Understanding GPS/GNSS: Principles and Applications. Artech House.
Conclusion
- Cell ID Positioning → Lowest power, worst accuracy. Best for coarse tracking, IoT devices.
- WiFi Positioning → Middle ground. It is more accurate than Cell ID, has lower power than GPS, and works indoors.
- GPS Positioning → Most accurate but power-hungry. Best for outdoor geolocation services.
For power-sensitive applications, Cell ID + WiFi positioning is a good alternative or complement to GPS-based tracking.
Combain offers hybrid, low-power tracking solutions that combine multiple positioning technologies to provide seamless indoor and outdoor tracking, featuring:
- Low-energy location tracking for extended battery life.
- AI-enhanced positioning that adapts to different tracking requirements
Asset Tracking and Management
Reducing Lost Time and Equipment Costs
Tracking tools, machinery, and materials is a constant challenge in large-scale construction projects and facility management. Workers frequently lose valuable time locating misplaced items, which leads to delays, inefficiencies, and costly equipment replacements.
With Combain’s positioning system, companies gain real-time visibility into the location of high-value assets. By tagging tools and equipment with Bluetooth or Wi-Fi-enabled devices, teams can instantly pinpoint their location — whether on a truck, or across a large job site.
Real-world Scenario and ROI
A construction firm operating across remote job sites faced constant delays due to misplaced tools and equipment. Workers often had to walk long distances or make repeated trips between storage areas, wasting valuable time and halting progress. After implementing a real-time positioning system, the company significantly reduced search time, streamlined daily operations, and kept projects moving on schedule.
Industry Insights & ROI estimations:
- Every day, workers lose up to 10% of their time simply searching for tools and attachments — a hidden drain on productivity that adds up fast across large crews and projects (ForConstructionPros, 2021)
Assuming a company has 50 workers, each working 8-hour shifts, the calculation shows the following:
- Daily hours lost: 40 (50 workers × 0.10 × 8 hours/day).
- Annual hours lost: 10,000 hours (40 hours × 250 workdays).
- Total annual financial loss: $500,000 (10,000 hours × $50 average hourly labor cost).
- Efficiency Improvement: Assuming a 50% reduction in time spent searching for tools
Implementing a tracking system that costs $100,000 annually reduces asset search time by 50%, generating $250,000 in annual savings.
ROI for Asset Tracking:

A 150% ROI in the first year shows that asset-tracking solutions quickly pay for themselves while greatly enhancing project efficiency.
Low-Power Asset Tracking
SIM Tracking over time and distance
Losing visibility and positioning of high-value assets can lead to serious delays, financial losses, and customer dissatisfaction. In industries operating across off-shore, remote, or complex environments — such as logistics, container shipping, energy, and industrial operations — the priority with positioning is long-term visibility.
For these use cases, low-power, low-maintenance tracking is essential, providing reliable location updates over months or even years, without frequent recharging or manual intervention. As supply chain resilience becomes a top priority, container visibility is no longer a “nice-to-have.” Low-power, long-life tracking solutions are increasingly in demand to provide reliable, cost-effective coverage across ports, rail hubs, warehouses, and open sea, without draining batteries or requiring manual intervention.
Industry Insights & ROI
- Today, over 60% of global consumer goods, representing nearly $14 trillion in value, are transported via container shipping, according to American Prospect (2022).
- Between 2008 and 2022, an average of 1,566 containers were lost at sea each year, according to the World Shipping Council (2023).
- Recent research on container shipping found that economic risks are the most pressing and threatening, surpassing political, technical, legal, social, and environmental risks (Zhou et al., 2022)*.
These insights underscore the urgent need for solutions that minimize financial losses and enhance operational resilience in industries requiring low-power positioning.
(click for references above)
Zhou, Y., Li, X. and Yuen, K.F., 2022. Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 220, p. 108305.
Real-World Scenario & Value
The logistics industry faces significant pressure to minimize delivery times, optimize routes, and prevent asset loss. Traditional GPS trackers often fall short due to high power consumption, complicated installations, and high costs. Combain’s Cell ID positioning, used in Traxmate IoT SIM Tracking, offers an affordable and maintenance-free alternative by utilizing SIM data to monitor the location of containers, pallets, or delivery trucks.
Value Delivered:
- End-to-End Visibility: Track shipments globally without the need for dedicated GPS devices.
- Zero Touch Maintenance: Ultra-low power consumption and no updates required, making it ideal for passive tracking.
- Delay Reduction: Monitor stuck or misrouted goods in real time and take proactive action.
- Geofencing for Compliance: Set up virtual zones (e.g., customs areas) to alert staff when shipments cross borders.
cost Savings and ROI Calculations
- Company X, a moderate-sized global freight operator, tracks 10,000 containers annually. Previously, each GPS tracker cost approximately $100/unit/year in power and maintenance, excluding upfront costs. The Combain & Traxmate SIM Tracking solution only costs approximately $8/unit/year because of its’ low power consumption and low-maintenance costs.
- Before Combain & Traxmate: $100 x 10,000 = $1000,000/year
- With Combain & Traxmate (SIM-based tracking using Cell ID): $8 x 10,000 = $80,000/year
Total Annual Cost Savings; ~$920,000 (92% cost reduction) using SIM Tracking.
Next Steps
To get started, contact us to schedule a consultation. Learn how efficient asset management and low-power positioning can empower you.